Boom or Bust: The Last Stand of the Attwater’s Prairie-Chicken

Each summer captive breeders release hundreds of the birds into Texan prairies鈥攂ut few survive. Maybe, just maybe, this year they'll get lucky.

In springtime, you can hear the booming all the way from the parking lot of the NASA Johnston Space Center in Houston, Texas, where, tucked away from the spaceflight mission control center and moon-rock laboratory, an outdoor pen holds a flock of critically endangered chickens. The sound first registers as a vague thrumming on the breeze; come closer and it resolves into a pitched, resonant call, hollow and haunting as breath over a glass bottle, accompanied by the staccato drum of tiny, scaled feet on hard-packed earth.

The sound belongs to the Attwater鈥檚 Prairie-Chicken, a one-and-a-half-pound grouse with dappled brown and white feathers. (It's a subspecies of the Greater Prairie-Chicken.) In 1900, as many as a million of the birds ranged along the coastal prairies from the Gulf Bend of Texas and into Louisiana, where every spring the males gathered to dance and boom for female attention. Then, agriculture and development swallowed up 99 percent of the native grassland; droughts, storms, and invasive fire ants pushed the population to the brink. In 1967, the Attwater's Prairie-Chicken was listed as endangered under the (the precursor to our modern Endangered Species Act). By 2002, the wild population sank below 50 birds.

These days it鈥檚 even lower. On August 25, 2017, the Category 4 Hurricane Harvey made landfall on the Texas coast. A record-breaking 60 inches of rainfall flooded out the bayous of Houston and swamped the surrounding countryside. At Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge, a 10,528-acre remnant of native prairie 89 miles west of NASA, the waters rose so high that then-refuge manager Terry Rossignol found bundles of brush tangled atop the wire of the four-foot-tall cattle fences. Tramping along the puddle-soaked plains, his crew found first one drowned bird, then another. Before the storm, the wild population comprised 42 birds. Mike Morrow, the refuge鈥檚 ecologist, suggests that the storm carried off 80 percent of them. 

鈥淚t felt like a kick in the teeth,鈥 Rossignol, who retired earlier this year, recalls. 鈥淚t was really demoralizing . . . It鈥檚 one of those things where you鈥檝e got to go home and cry about it one night and get it over with, and then you come back and say: 鈥極kay, things are going to line up next year.鈥欌

It鈥檚 a feeling familiar to many who work with the Attwater鈥檚 Prairie-Chicken. For 26 years, a coalition of zoos, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials, and private citizens have tried to salvage the remnants of the population. They鈥檝e spent decades developing a breeding program鈥攑airing up adult birds at NASA, and raising their chicks at the Houston Zoo before releasing them to the wild at the refuge鈥攐nly to see many of their efforts falter due to a parade of bad luck. Which means the prairie-chicken is at the center of a very human story of frustration and hope, as the people tasked with saving it wrestle with a difficult question: What happens when you do everything right, and it still isn鈥檛 enough?

One of the things prairie-chickens like to do is dance. It鈥檚 a sunny day when I drive out to the breeding pens at NASA, a hot wind rolling over the green-gold grass, flowers the color of egg yolk clustering along the borders of the chicken wire. The prairie here is another remaining sliver of native grassland, and is a magnet for wildlife; deer lope by in the distance, and night herons primly stalk along the drainage ditches.

Hannah Bailey, the Houston Zoo鈥檚 curator of birds, unlocks the door to the breeding area and ushers me inside. On either side of a covered gravel walkway are two parallel rows of pens, 12 to a side, each holding a pair of chickens鈥攖he males conspicuous with their orange air sacs compared to the smaller, muted females. Despite the small facility鈥檚 location, it鈥檚 wholly operated by staff from the Houston Zoo, to whom NASA offered the land in 2005. It stands now as the zoo鈥檚 primary matchmaking spot for prairie-chickens, and the air hums with the sound of excited birds.

Most of the males are busy displaying in the dust as we come in. Their routines proceed according to clearly delineated steps: an aggressive cackle, a rapid, thumping tap dance, 鈥攏eck sacks inflating, pinnae feathers standing tall as rabbit ears. They glare at each other as they perform, and occasionally get into scuffles with neighbors through the mesh dividing each pen. The hens are more circumspect. Earlier in the season they would have come forward for a brief, flurried assignation if they liked what they saw; by May it鈥檚 late enough that most have mated, though a few examine the prospects with a critical eye. 

Like most captive-breeding efforts, the mated pairs are chosen deliberately. Every September before the breeding season starts, everyone involved in the program鈥攊ncluding stakeholders from the refuge and the various zoos that raise prairie-chickens (Glen Rose鈥檚 Fossil Rim Wildlife Center, Caldwell Zoo, Abilene Zoo, and the Houston Zoo, which has the largest breeding facility of the bunch)鈥攎eet to take stock of the captive population and to decide which birds will be paired in the coming season. Birds are shipped to various breeding facilities in October, and they begin to work themselves up through competition by February. Mating occurs through April and May.

Convincing the birds that the captive-breeding facility is a worthy mating ground has taken some trial and error. Initially each breeding pen was visually walled off from the others with mesh blinders to stop the males from fighting. But zoo staff soon discovered problems with this approach. In the wild, prairie-chicken breeding is a rough-and-tumble affair, with males gathering in natural arenas called leks to display and tussle for the hens鈥 edification, working each other up through competition. Females choose the showiest and most impressive mates鈥攐ne reason prairie-chickens are so ridiculous looking鈥攁nd they tend to select carefully. The fertility of both sexes is intricately tied to this ritual. In the pens, however, the males couldn鈥檛 see each other, and so often failed to display; the females, unable to choose, often laid infertile eggs. The keepers solved the problem by removing the blinders, allowing the birds to see each other and better simulate the competition of the lek. Now, while females don't have quite as much free choice as in the wild鈥攖he keepers choose their partners based on genetic compatibility鈥攖he appearance of choice means their fertility has skyrocketed.

The catch, though, is that zoo staff have had to accept that male prairie-chickens will do their level best to beat each other up through the blinders. Once, Bailey says, she came in to find one of the males鈥攕ubsequently dubbed 鈥淔rankenchicken鈥濃攂adly beaten and limping around the wrong pen; they suspect that he snuck into the pen next door to fight with his neighbor. He was in bad shape鈥攕calped, feathers bloody and askew鈥攕o they took him to the vet for stitches. He returned a conquering hero.

鈥淓very hen that was around there was just standing at the front, like ooooh,鈥 Bailey says, her voice fond. 鈥淭hey loved him . . . That鈥檚 the thing about the chickens; they鈥檙e so dang resilient.鈥

鈥淚t's amazing they can go through all of this and still boom."

Once the birds have mated, zoo staff pull the eggs as soon as they're laid, swap them with dummies, and drive them some 30 miles into downtown Houston, where they鈥檙e deposited in the zoo's incubators. They usually hatch after about 26 days, and the first room the hatchlings ever see sits in the back of the zoo鈥檚 bird facility. Gently humming machines line tables above white-tiled floors. Inside, rows of two-inch, fawn-colored eggs turn occasionally on rollers. A wine cooler used to keep developing eggs in stasis sits over in one corner.

There are about 500 eggs here, 60 or 200 to a machine, each carefully marked with genealogical information. When Bailey opens up the hatchling incubator, a gaggle of tiny faces bob into view. The day-old chicks are bouncy and restless鈥攎ottled brown-and-yellow balls of down that pop up and down, trying to see over the edge of the towel-lined containers. At a week old, they鈥檙e transferred into big metal tubs, where they zip around under heat lamps. After two weeks, they transition to outdoor pens behind the building. From there, keeping the fast-growing birds alive is mostly a matter of stopping them from killing themselves: They have a frustrating tendency to break their necks or concuss themselves by flying into the mesh. 

鈥淚f the chicks can injure themselves, they will,鈥 Bailey says. 鈥淏ut we shoot for a survival rate of 75 to 80 percent [of all chicks that hatch], and we've met it many years.鈥

It鈥檚 when the birds leave the incubation centers that they start running into trouble. Over the past few years, Bailey and her staff have raised hundreds of chicks every spring. But many don鈥檛 get a chance to grow up鈥攁nd few that do manage to successfully breed in the wild.

The process of releasing captive-bred birds goes in stages. First the months-old chicks are transported from the city to outside pens at the Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge, where they get used to their surroundings. (Prairie-chickens grow fast, so the adolescent birds are generally capable of fending for themselves.) After about two weeks, the doors are opened and the birds are allowed out into the tall grass. The staff puts out food for a week or two, and eventually the wild birds wander off to start new lives.

In 1995, the first year, they released 13 chicks. Then it was 50, then 100. Now, the Houston Zoo alone releases 250 or 300 birds annually, with a few dozen more released by other zoos. (Most birds are released at the refuge; less than a dozen wild prairie-chickens survive on private land in Goliad County down the Texas coast.)

The growth of the captive-breeding program lies in stark contrast to the difficulty the partners have had in bringing that success into the wild.

When zoo staff first began releasing birds back onto the refuge in the 1990s, their chicks鈥攖he first wild generation鈥攂egan turning up dead. Morrow, the refuge ecologist who collected the first wild Attwater鈥檚 Prairie-Chicken eggs to raise in captivity, and his colleagues would visit the birds鈥 favorite roosting spots and find little bodies dropped by what appeared to be starvation. 鈥淲e couldn鈥檛 figure out why it wasn鈥檛 working,鈥 Morrow says. Eventually, they found the culprit: invasive red fire ants, whose voracious appetites cleared the prairie of the small native insects the chicks depended on for food. (Although there鈥檚 now no way to prove it, Morrow suspects that the sharp declines in prairie-chicken numbers happened when the ants expanded their range into the coastal prairies in the 1960s.)

In 2014, the refuge began treating for ants, and released chicks were living longer. Those were good days, Bailey says: They鈥檇 worked out most of the kinks in the breeding program and things were looking up.

But they couldn鈥檛 control the weather. A long drought, followed by the 2015 Tax Day flood, the 2016 Memorial Day Flood, and then the 2017 juggernaut of Hurricane Harvey repeatedly decimated the wild population. The hurricane struck in the middle of the release season, with 249 birds on the ground. Perhaps 80 percent of the birds drowned, young and old alike.

There鈥檚 a name for this kind of run of bad luck, Morrow says: an 鈥渆xtinction vortex,鈥 which is what happens when a species鈥 numbers drop so low that any setback potentially drags them closer to extinction. Things that could normally be absorbed by a healthy population spread across a wide geographic range鈥攁 direct hit from a hurricane or natural predation from owls and coyotes鈥攕uddenly become a matter of life or death, and attrition alone can drag a species down. The average survival rate for wild prairie-chickens, assuming everything goes well, is about 50 percent per year, Morrow says.

鈥淪o if you wipe out any gains from reproduction, you're going to see a 50 percent drop in your population every year,鈥 he says. 鈥淲hen the population gets smaller and smaller, it's more likely that one of those otherwise relatively minor perturbations to the populations will pull it to the point of extinction."

It鈥檚 hard now to escape the possibility that Attwater鈥檚 Prairie-Chickens have simply been pushed too close to the edge. Climate change has contributed to a trend of stronger hurricanes on the Gulf Coast, with unhappy results for humans and animal alike. The marching concrete sprawl of Houston鈥攚hich contributed to excessive floodwaters that native grasses would have sucked down鈥攕hows no sign of abating. Right now there鈥檚 quite a bit more native prairie left than there are chickens to fill it, but that says more about chicken numbers than the health of the prairie.

鈥淲e have amongst ourselves had discussions about [extinction],鈥 Rossignol says. 鈥淲hat makes it tough is that if everything lined up perfectly for a couple of years, the birds would rebound. The chickens are a boom-and-bust species. They have the potential to drop dramatically from one year to another. They also have the potential to bounce up. Unfortunately, we鈥檝e had a lot more bad years than we鈥檝e had good years.鈥

He sighs. 鈥淚t鈥檚 difficult to ask someone to put 20 years of their life into something and then say, 鈥榚h, call it quits.鈥欌

The thing to remember is that all population growth is slow to start, even with fast-booming species, Morrow says. You just need some breaks early on to get a toehold, and then things will start to move fairly quickly. There are plenty of possibilities for where the program can go next: putting birds on more private land, moving more aggressively against ants, continuing to tinker with captive breeding so that when a window of opportunity opens, they鈥檒l be ready.

鈥淚'm more confident now than I have been in 28 years that I've been working here that we will make some progress, if we can get some breaks on the weather,鈥 Morrow says. 鈥淎nd we will . . . A lot of people think we ought to be able to snap our fingers and make it all better. But endangered species don't get into trouble overnight. And I think it's pretty naive to think you can fix it overnight, too."

The program itself has been incredibly valuable as an experimental laboratory for figuring out how to work with grouse, Bailey says. They鈥檝e developed comprehensive guidelines for any institution interested in trying their hand at breeding Attwater鈥檚 Prairie-Chickens, and some have used it for related species, too. In 2014, Canada鈥檚 Calgary Zoo began a sage-grouse captive-breeding program after consulting with people from the Attwater鈥檚 program, and raised 50 chicks in their first year鈥攊n part because they didn鈥檛 have to start entirely from scratch. It鈥檚 a particularly impressive achievement given that most efforts to breed sage-grouse in captivity have failed

"People always ask, well, what if this doesn't work?鈥 Bailey says. 鈥淎nd, you know, it might not.鈥

鈥淵ou have to accept that as someone who works in conservation,鈥 she continues. 鈥淏ut if it doesn't work, we've made so much headway in other grouse and prairie species that it's made a difference already in the world . . . It hasn鈥檛 been a waste.鈥

Out in the pens at NASA, the prairie-chicken males are still dancing the old dance, steps they come out of the egg knowing, its rhythm coded in their bones. They鈥檒l dance it as long as there are hens left to watch; the hens will lay as long as there are males there to woo them.

The Houston Zoo team has a lot of work to do to ensure that future: chicks to release, anthills to treat, private landowners to negotiate with. After all, this might be the year that everything goes right.

***

爆料公社 is a nonprofit, and stories like this are made possible by readers like you.