In Florida’s Plan to Take Over Wetland Permits, Critics See a Gift to Developers

The state doesn't have the resources or track record to assume a major program from the federal government, environmentalists say.

Update: After the EPA to assume 404 permitting authority in December 2020, a court overturned that approval on February 15, 2024. The that the agency and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act in turning the permitting program over to the state.

In less than a month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will make a decision that could have massive stakes for Florida鈥檚 water and wildlife.

In August, the state to the EPA asking to take over a federal program that issues permits for construction in wetland areas, saying it would streamline the permitting process. Florida builders have long advocated for the state to assume the program鈥攁 lobbyist once called it for developers. 

But conservationists say the state鈥檚 environmental agency is already understaffed and underperforming, and giving it control of the program will only accelerate the destruction of wetlands at a time when they are under pressure from developers and essential for absorbing the blows of climate change. 鈥淭he idea that we would reduce protections in any way, or accelerate the destruction of wetlands, is really awful,鈥 says Tania Galloni, managing attorney for Florida at Earthjustice, a nonprofit environmental law group. 鈥淭he state taking over this federal program would result in less protection.鈥

The timing of the EPA鈥檚 decision is significant: If the agency approves the request on its December 17 deadline, it would hand over control 30 days later鈥攋ust two days before the end of the Trump administration.

Wetland permitting in Florida is complicated, but generally speaking, projects that will affect major waterways need what鈥檚 called a 404 permit鈥攁 reference to the section of the Clean Water Act that regulates disposal of 鈥渄redge or fill material鈥 into water bodies鈥攆rom the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Projects affecting water bodies not connected to those federally regulated waters need a permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, or DEP. And many projects need both. 

Developers say the process is overly complex and takes too long. Approved state wetland permits 鈥渁re regularly received months or even years in advance of their federal counterparts,鈥 said Florida Home Builders Association CEO Rusty Payton in an emailed statement to 爆料公社 magazine. 鈥淭he two permits are often indistinguishable, aside from the permit issuance date.鈥 

Florida began its latest effort to take over the permitting program in 2018 under then-Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican. Under the Clean Water Act, states can ask the EPA to let them take over 404 permits, as long as the state has a rigorous enough program. A number of in that direction, but so far only Michigan and New Jersey have assumed that authority, and that was back in the 1980s and 鈥90s. Experts say no other states have followed through because the process is onerous and the resulting program requires significant resources to run. A year ago, Arizona abandoned its effort after the plan faced 鈥渙pposition from virtually everyone concerned about the issue,鈥

The stakes are especially high for the Sunshine State. Even after losing nearly half its original wetlands to drainage and development, Florida still has more of them left鈥攁round 11.4 million acres鈥攖han any state but Alaska. The Everglades and other swamps, sloughs, and marshes are essential habitat for wading birds whose populations in Florida have plunged over the past several decades, such as Wood Storks, Tricolored Herons, and Roseate Spoonbills. The loss of pollution-filtering wetlands is  in the state鈥檚 ongoing battle with toxic algae outbreaks. And as climate change brings worsening floods, wetlands provide an increasingly valuable natural service by soaking up and holding water like sponges. 

The state continues to lose wetlands at a worrying rate; between 1996 and 2014, Collier and Lee counties in Southwest Florida alone lost some 30,000 acres. Still, environmentalists say those losses would be worse without the Army Corps involved. As a federal entity, the Corps is more insulated from local politics than state agencies, they argue. Plus, before projects receive a permit from the Corps, they鈥檙e subject to a review of their environmental impacts and a public-comment period under the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, which would not apply to the program under state control. 鈥淚n other words, it could have been much worse, and if Florida takes over, it will be the much worse scenario,鈥 Galloni says. 

The state鈥檚 application doesn鈥檛 explain how it will replace the safeguards that NEPA provides, says Beth Alvi, director of policy for . Nor does it lay out how the state will assess how projects will affect species protected by the Endangered Species Act, another federal requirement that would go away if Florida assumes the 404 program. And she and other critics say the state has not clearly explained which water bodies will fall under its jurisdiction; federal law requires the Corps to oversee navigable waters, but exactly what that means is complicated, particularly in water-rich Florida. 鈥淛ust on the face of it, the application is incomplete,鈥 Alvi says. 鈥淚t鈥檚 not ready for prime time. Let鈥檚 get questions answered. Let鈥檚 get more time for public comment before you make this decision.鈥 

The DEP is saying it can take on 404 permitting and enforcement without increased staffing or costs. 鈥淒EP鈥檚 intimate knowledge of state aquatic resources, coupled with the efficiency and proven success of its own wetland permitting program, will ensure that the Section 404 program will be implemented in a scientifically sound and protective manner,鈥 said Alexandra Kuchta, deputy press secretary for the DEP, in an email. The pace of federal permitting delays not only housing and commercial development, but also environmental restoration projects, Kuchta said. 

But critics say the department lacks the staff, resources, and track record to suggest it can successfully manage the program, especially without significant new funding. The DEP suffered stiff budget cuts and shed more than 600 employees when Scott was governor, and hasn鈥檛 come close to recovering under his successor, fellow Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. The agency now opens far fewer enforcement cases than a decade ago, and its enforcement rate for violations in the state dredge-and-fill program dropped from 47 percent in 2018 to 36 percent last year,  from Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. 

Recent cutbacks at the DEP are especially noteworthy given that, when the state considered making a bid to take over the program in 2005, the department said it couldn鈥檛 take on the extra work without more money and staff. 鈥淲hat I don鈥檛 understand is how that was the case in 2005, and yet now, the state鈥檚 DEP says, 鈥榃ell, we can take on this responsibility. We鈥檒l just shuffle around a few resources,鈥欌 says Christopher Meindl, a geographer at the University of South Florida who wrote about the state鈥檚 effort to take over the program. 

No wonder, then, that many observers are skeptical of the department鈥檚 ability to take on a new permitting responsibility that will only grow as more sun-seekers flood the state. Economists expect Florida鈥檚 population to swell by an average of more than 303,000 people per year from now to 2025, the equivalent of . They鈥檒l all need somewhere to live, and the state is one-third wetland.