Many birds, particularly songbirds, migrate at night, navigating by the moon and stars. Mostly flying at altitudes below 2,000 feet, and even lower on foggy and rainy nights, they often become disoriented by brightly lit windows in tall buildings. The result is horrific: more than 100 million bird deaths in North America annually, and as many as 1,000 bird deaths per major structure, reports . In response, 爆料公社 and its partners have organized Lights Out campaigns, urging buildings to hit the off-switch at night for bird safety.
In 1991 Toronto became the world鈥檚 first city to address urban bird collisions when it launched the Fatal Light Awareness Program (FLAP). About a decade later Chicago became the first U.S. city to follow suit. Today, as the movement has picked up significant momentum, more than 20 North American metropolitan areas鈥攔anging from major cities like Washington, D.C., to smaller ones like Winston-Salem, North Carolina鈥攑articipate in similar programs. The programs vary, but they鈥檙e typically a collaboration between an 爆料公社 chapter and local partners and involve convincing building managers and owners to join in by educating them about the benefits.
Many cities also provide online resources for bird-friendly and sustainable development. Toronto鈥檚 , for example, suggest using reflection-free glass and visual markers on buildings and outline how to use lights to optimize bird safety. Participation is voluntary, and Lights Out programs usually focus on getting buildings to take part between midnight and sunrise for several months a year during spring and fall migration, when the bulk of migrating birds are passing through.
鈥淭here are multiple reasons why Lights Out programs are valuable,鈥 says Don Gorney, program manager for . 鈥淚t saves bird lives and also promotes energy conservation.鈥
Lights Out programs began to get popular in the United States about a decade ago. In fall 2001 Robbie Hunsinger, a freelance oboist turned bird advocate, attended a presentation in Chicago by the director of FLAP and immediately determined that she would do something about bird collisions and buildings. In 2002 Hunsinger founded the Chicago Bird Collision Monitors to raise awareness about bird collisions and also to collect dead and injured birds off the city鈥檚 streets (see 鈥,鈥 November-December 2008).
鈥淚 was very concerned about this, so I started contacting building managers myself and explaining that, 鈥楬ey, we鈥檙e finding a lot of dead birds at your building,鈥 鈥 says Hunsinger. 鈥淚 made friends with doormen, sweepers, and building managers. My protocol for the program was that there were no bad feelings or angry confrontations with managers because they were working with us and allowing us on their property. One by one the buildings starting turning off their lights.鈥 Hunsinger鈥檚 grassroots effort was a smashing success. By 2004 every building in Chicago taller than 60 stories hit the switch for night-migrating birds.
Hunsinger points out that her activism was built on a foundation laid by then-Mayor Richard Daley, who had set the stage for Lights Out Chicago by launching it in principle a few years before Hunsinger came along. 鈥淢ayor Daley got Lights Out all written up; they just needed someone to do this on the ground,鈥 says Hunsinger, who even earned a bird-rehabilitation license in service to the cause and donated her cell phone number as the Bird Collision hotline. 鈥淚t was like the perfect storm. People were just ready to help, and it was ready to go in Chicago.鈥
Today Chicago Bird Collision Monitors has more than 100 volunteers. Seven days a week, about a dozen of them take turns walking or biking the streets at sunrise to find dead or injured birds.
Because of Chicago鈥檚 location along the Mississippi Flyway and on Lake Michigan鈥斺渁n unfortunate channel,鈥 Hunsinger says鈥攙olunteers still see an incredibly high number of bird casualties. On just one September morning they found 270 injured birds and 320 dead birds, mostly white-throated sparrows, brown creepers, and golden-crowned kinglets, according to Annette Prince, who now directs Chicago Bird Collision Monitors. Other common casualties include ovenbirds, Nashville warblers, yellow-bellied sapsuckers, and hermit thrushes.
Still, it鈥檚 unclear what the casualty numbers really mean. 鈥淚t鈥檚 hard to use bird strikes to measure program success. We actually find more birds today than we did in 2004 because we have more volunteers to cover a greater area,鈥 explains Prince. 鈥淚t鈥檚 doesn鈥檛 mean things are getting worse; it just means we have more outreach, and I think success is measured by the awareness we raise.鈥 By that standard Chicago has clearly set a model for other cities to emulate.
That doesn鈥檛 mean there aren鈥檛 plenty of other success stories. Take Lights Out in Minneapolis. Joanna Eckles, coordinator of 爆料公社 Minnesota鈥檚 Project BirdSafe/Lights Out, started the program after she, like Hunsinger, heard a lecture by FLAP鈥檚 director. To raise architects鈥 awareness about bird collisions, she and her team have offered lunch-hour educational talks. They鈥檝e also spread the word via the newsletter of the Minnesota Building Owners and Managers Association.
Some 60 private buildings in Minneapolis have come on board during spring and fall migrations. And last May 1 the University of Minnesota began administering both required and recommended bird safety construction guidelines, alongside other construction guidelines, to any new buildings that receive state bond money鈥攁 zoo, for instance, or a stadium or park building. One required guideline is that glass on upper floors of buildings must have visual markings to deter birds.
As in Chicago, Lights Out in both Minneapolis and St. Paul depend on a cadre of volunteers who walk mapped-out routes each morning, looking for bird casualties. Warblers and sparrows are the most commonly found species.
Also as in Chicago, statistics may be misleading. 鈥淢easuring the program effect is really a challenge because there are so many factors that aren鈥檛 controllable,鈥 Eckles says. 鈥淵ou can test it by one problem building, but I think the real measure of success is in the awareness we have raised, like the state coming to us and asking us to put bird safety information in a state construction guideline. That鈥檚 huge.鈥
East Coast cities are also involved. Lights Out New York, for example, has been active since 2005. More than 90 of the city鈥檚 buildings have signed on, including such iconic properties as Rockefeller Center, the Chrysler Building, and the Time Warner Center. 鈥淚 think that Lights Out is really a win-win sort of solution,鈥 says Adriana Palmer, coordinator of New York City 爆料公社鈥檚 Project Safe Flight. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a clear benefit to the birds, but for the buildings, any time they are turning off lights they are also saving energy and money.鈥
offers yet another model. Its program was founded in the fall of 2008 by Massachusetts 爆料公社 and Mayor Thomas Menino, and today more than 45 buildings participate, turning off both internal and decorative lights. Besides benefiting the birds, the program also helps Menino pursue his goal of decreasing Boston鈥檚 greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050.
Other cities, from Paris to Santa Rosa, California (see 鈥,鈥 Field Notes, May-June 2013) have joined in, turning off their lights at night to save energy and help birds. In Houston companies, by becoming involved in the Lights Out program, are also supporting the city鈥檚 stated goal of becoming the U.S. 鈥淓nergy Conservation Capital.鈥 Then there鈥檚 , an international tradition that began in six years ago in Australia; for one hour every March, cities and residences around the world go dark to save energy. All told, 153 countries have participated.
On the other hand, the movement is growing more slowly in some cities than others. San Francisco鈥檚 Lights Out program, for example, started about four years ago under the . Although many buildings participated the first year, the chapter鈥檚 small staff and limited resources have prevented it from tracking bird mortality and assessing if the program is really paying off. This year the Lights Out people designed a 鈥攁 silhouette of birds against a city sky鈥攊n hopes it will give the program a new educational push, says Ilana DeBare, Golden Gate 爆料公社鈥檚 communications director.
Lights Out Indianapolis, inspired by the success of Lights Out Chicago, was formed in 2009 by the Amos Butler 爆料公社 Society. Although the program has enjoyed only modest success so far鈥攋ust six buildings have signed up鈥攖hings are looking up. 鈥淪ince 2009 to 2012, we observed 1,299 bird strikes, counted by volunteers, and we demonstrated that certain buildings are problematic,鈥 adds Gorney. 鈥淣ow, with the help of the City of Indianapolis and the help of the Indianapolis Zoo, we are making big progress educating buildings on Lights Out and bird safety.鈥 Above all, The Chase Tower, at 48 stories the city鈥檚 tallest building, is in compliance.
Other more creative approaches are gaining traction. For instance, Chicago is encouraging buildings to shut off lights in lobbies, especially those with interior foliage, which can attract birds. Other cities, including Minneapolis, are pushing for changes in the way buildings are built. Eckles and others would like to see architects consider bird safety the way they currently factor in such things as energy use and heat gain. 鈥淚鈥檇 like to have bird safety be a part of what we think of sustainable design,鈥 she says.
Some have a loftier goal: cross-city collaboration. 鈥淲hat I would like to see is connectivity between programs, because if you think about it, these birds are making a huge trek through entire flyways,鈥 says Eckles. 鈥淚 would love to see us sharing strategies and solutions, getting nationwide legislation, and coordinating efforts.鈥
From all indications, the prospects for Lights Out programs look brighter than ever. 鈥淭here was just a lot of goodwill, as nobody likes to see a dead or injured bird,鈥 says Chicago鈥檚 Hunsinger. 鈥淲e became on a first-name basis with doormen. Patagonia even donated organic cotton T-shirts for the volunteers. This has been just a beautiful human story.鈥