Where Have All the Rare Bird Alerts Gone?

Long before eBird, birders simply called up an avian hotline to learn where to chase unusual birds. Today these phone services are themselves sliding toward extinction鈥攚ith one notable exception.
The invention of early home answering machines, such as the PhoneMate, helped birding hotlines take off in the 1950s to 1970s.

There has to be a last of everything: Passenger Pigeons, unicorns, Jedis, suppers. One of birding鈥檚 most historic and influential institutions isn鈥檛 quite there yet, but the phone services that announce unusual bird sightings鈥攌nown as Rare Bird Alerts, hotlines, or dial-a-bird numbers鈥攁re clearly an endangered species. Cutting-edge in their day, these services capitalized on emerging telecommunications technology to deliver news to birders in what then would have been considered real time.

The Rare Bird Alert loomed large in my childhood. My parents were divorced, and my brother and I spent weekends with my bird-obsessed father. While other kids passed their Saturdays attending matin茅es or playing Little League, our afternoons followed a different routine: After arriving at my dad鈥檚 house, we鈥檇 call the New York Rare Bird Alert. We鈥檇 crowd by the receiver to hear a list of the week鈥檚 unusual sightings. That would determine our pursuit, whether chasing a Northern Saw-whet Owl in the Bronx鈥檚 Pelham Bay Park or a Sabine鈥檚 Gull on eastern Long Island.

The first birding-by-phone service rolled out in the 1950s, and the concept鈥檚 popularity grew through the next five decades鈥攂efore crashing headlong into listservs, social media, and ultimately the Cornell Lab of Ornithology鈥檚 eBird app and website, which allow instant lookup of logged bird sightings anywhere in the world. In contrast, the avian dial-ins were usually labors of love, managed by a single person who gathered local sightings and recorded the (generally) weekly notices on an answering machine, often housed at a local 爆料公社 Society office or in the compiler鈥檚 home. To access the updates, birders simply called and listened to the outgoing message.

Rare Bird Alerts once set the rhythm for the lives of serious birders. The dispatches and the pursuits that followed were ritualized, narrow, and highly curated. That search for the unusual, the stray, the accidental, has now been folded into a vast array of information that makes birding a more expansive, more democratic activity. Though the technology that has replaced these hotlines still honors the chase, the experience鈥攍ike everything that has been transformed by data and analytics鈥攆eels less personal. And for the birding hotlines that have hung on into this century, with one very notable exception, there is a sense that time has run out.

A

columnist in Woman鈥檚 Day seemed incredulous, but impressed, by the technological advance heralded in the August 1956 issue: Fifteen hundred people each day, he wrote, 鈥済et half a minute鈥檚 updating on just what feathered friends have been sighted where. This is because they are connected with a talking telephone...鈥

At the time Boston鈥檚 鈥淰oice of 爆料公社,鈥 the very first recorded avian hotline, had no parallels in the birding world, but it launched at the dawn of a golden age of dial-up information services. Unanswered phones meant hundreds of thousands of 鈥渓ost鈥 calls daily, according to a 1954 U.S. Federal Communications Commission report. Improvements in recording technology offered a solution, and with its advent, dozens of hotline services sprang up. Callers could hear a daily prayer, a report on which fish were biting, and, most popularly, a weather report. (New York鈥檚 meteorologic line alone received an average of about three million calls monthly, according to Woman鈥檚 Day.)

__________

The first recorded avian hotline had no parallels in the birding world, but it launched at the dawn of a golden age of dial-up information services.

__________

The Massachusetts 爆料公社 Society founded the Boston alert to help stem the tide of bird-identification requests that flooded the group鈥檚 switchboard as the hobby grew. At the time, birders communicated mostly via phone trees: One birder would dial several others, who鈥檇 notify whomever they鈥檇 been assigned to alert鈥攃reating a literal game of telephone. At Mass 爆料公社 headquarters, staff member Ruth Emery 鈥済ot trapped into answering the many calls that came into the office from an insatiably curious public,鈥 wrote James Baird, who eulogized Emery in a 1991 issue of Bird Observer. A meeting was arranged between renowned Harvard ornithologist Ludlow Griscom and several other society members. The idea discussed was something totally new: a universal dial-a-bird. A board member who worked at New England Telephone, Henry Parker, helped obtain the technology and Emery became its first voice. The service launched in December 1954 and was an instant hit. 鈥淣ot only was the Voice greeted with enthusiasm by birders,鈥 Baird wrote, 鈥渂ut it achieved considerable notoriety through demonstrations at sales meetings and boardrooms all across the country (and abroad), where it was presented as an example of the new communications frontier.鈥

Early dial-in services had to rely on expensive technology, such as the 28-pound Tele-Magnet (whose 1950s price of $300 is equivalent to more than $3,000 today), and Boston鈥檚 alert stood alone for more than a decade. That changed with the introduction of the Ansafone in 1960, followed by a slew of other recording devices, like the PhoneMate. In 1968 the 爆料公社 Naturalist Society, which covers the Washington, D.C., area, launched its own service, 鈥淭he Voice of the Naturalist,鈥 which incorporated announcements of field trips and other endeavors. By the 1970s many local birding organizations were offering their own hotlines.

As with Boston, New York had an ideal candidate for helping to set up its own Rare Bird Alert, a task first undertaken by the Linnean Society of New York. Tom Davis was a shorebird expert legendary for his formidable identification skills. Davis worked in telecommunications, as a technician for New York Telephone, and he was already known for setting up conference calls with birders around the country as a way to socialize his hobby. 鈥淗e was able to use sophisticated equipment,鈥 recalls Joseph DiCostanzo, a former president of the society. 鈥淵ou鈥檇 get a call from him and never know who else would be on the line.鈥 The system Davis organized with Hofstra University ornithologist Paul A. Buckley had, at first, a single call-in number for listening to alerts鈥攖he one my dad would dial鈥攁long with a network of local numbers so that callers could report finds without incurring a pricey long-distance charge. 

Davis was a rigorous interlocuter of bird sightings. Calling in a rarity didn鈥檛 mean instant addition to the Rare Bird Alert. I saw Davis鈥檚 meticulousness firsthand in June 1973鈥擨 was 11 years old鈥攚hen my father thought he鈥檇 spotted an 爆料公社鈥檚 Shearwater off a beach on eastern Long Island. After reporting the bird, my father soon received a call from Davis. A few hours later, Davis, my father, my brother, and I were standing at the Atlantic shoreline, telescopes trained on masses of Sooty and Great Shearwaters. Mixed among them were a few Manx Shearwaters, a bird unusual in the Northeast at the time. Davis determined that my father spotted a Manx Shearwater, not an 爆料公社鈥檚, but the sighting was interesting enough to make the Rare Bird Alert.

By 1976 there were at least 17 U.S. bird-alert services, according to the February issue of American Birds. (The journal described New York鈥檚, almost certainly to the consternation of the Massachusetts cohort, as the 鈥渃r猫me de la cr猫me.鈥) The phenomenon manifested in pop culture the following year when avant-garde composer John Cage premiered 鈥淭elephones and Birds.鈥 The composition instructed performers to make live calls to U.S. Rare Bird Alerts, sequenced according to a randomization scheme based in the ancient Chinese divination guide, the I Ching.

Though most birding hotlines remained regional, one well-known 鈥渧oice鈥 had greater ambitions. Seeing the potential in Rare Bird Alerts that would later be realized by electronic databases, Bob Odear, with his wife, Pamela, launched a subscription service called NARBA鈥攖he North American Rare Bird Alert鈥攂illed as 鈥渢he first continent-wide reference service with rare bird sighting information.鈥 Lacking advanced technology, the Odears reportedly had to use a crude method of verifying customers: listening to who was phoning in and stopping the message if they weren鈥檛 members.

Through the late 1990s, there were about 150 bird hotlines across the United States and Canada, according to an archived online directory from the American Birding Association. Over the next few years, the internet would become ubiquitous, and bird spottings could be more easily announced via social media, listservs, and websites. By 2005 the directory had diminished by one-quarter. In 2018 it vanished. Today, it has been replaced with a page aggregating email and Facebook alerts.

So, how rare have rare bird alerts become? I came across a directory of about 40 surviving dial-in numbers from , then went about calling each one. It was gratifying to learn that New York鈥檚 cr猫me de la cr猫me line was being maintained. Tom Burke, who has run the service since shortly before Davis鈥檚 death in 1986, says the deluge of online data about bird sightings makes his hotline鈥攚hich he records once a week through a Zoom line hosted by 爆料公社鈥攎ore valuable. 鈥淭he information is so fragmented and vast,鈥 he says. 鈥淲e鈥檙e the only true, easy-to-access summary out there.鈥

In Massachusetts, Wayne Petersen, director of Mass 爆料公社鈥檚 Important Bird Areas program, had become the Voice of 爆料公社. There鈥檚 something charming, almost magical, about his reports. One told of a very rare European Golden-Plover spotted on Duxbury Beach, a thin spit of land extending into Cape Cod Bay. As exciting as that find was, Petersen took the time to add a tender reminder to go beyond tallying and sighting birds. 鈥淟isten to the trilled calls of common toads,鈥 he tells callers, 鈥渁nd be sure to notice blooming coltsfoot along gravelly roadsides and the delicate blossoms of hepatica on dry wooded slopes...鈥

For most of the rest of the country, the Rare Bird Alert appears to have sunsetted. More than 30 of the numbers I called were simply dead. Others have zombified鈥攆eaturing alerts from years back that haven鈥檛 been erased or updated. A few, including The Voice of the Naturalist, referred callers to general phone lines or web addresses. One hotline seemed to be of ambiguous vivacity. Though no bird sightings were listed, the solicitation of new finds appeared to be ongoing: 鈥淗ello! You鈥檝e reached the birding information hotline, sponsored by the Grand Valley 爆料公社 Society and the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Leave your sighting information and we will update this message as appropriate.鈥

Hoping against hope, I emailed the 爆料公社 chapter and got this reply from conservation chair Nic Korte: 鈥淭his was forwarded to me...No one uses it. The truth is, we are glad someone reminded us to stop paying for the line.鈥

But there was one ray of optimism. Though my calls to Ohio hadn鈥檛 yielded much (Cleveland and Cincinnati are defunct), when I rang the number for north-central Ohio, I got this message: 鈥淭hursday, May 4th. The new number for the Bobolink Area Rare Bird Alert is 574-642-1335...I want to thank Eli Miller for the effort that he has put in to continue with the Rare Bird Alert. Please continue to report your rare bird sightings as you have before and hope to see you in the field.鈥

When I called that number, I was met with a detailed report. A Nelson鈥檚 Sparrow had been seen 鈥渁long the trails of the observation tower,鈥 while 鈥淛oseph Miller reported a flock of seven meadowlarks hanging around.鈥 The sightings spanned a wide swath of Ohio, yet they had an intimate quality to them. My interest was piqued. How was it that an archaic form of communication still thrived in this pocket of a world that had nearly rendered it obsolete?

The answer, once found, seemed both obvious and unexpected. It鈥檚 Amish birders. Lots of them. And Eli Miller is their voice, the voice of what is perhaps the country鈥檚 most active remaining Rare Bird Alert.

Like a lot of people, I have an idea of what Amish practices are, but also have no idea if my notions are accurate. The Amish faith is one of several offshoots of a 16th-century Protestant movement called Anabaptism. Along with Mennonites, the Amish came to North America in the 1700s, looking for the freedom to conduct, as scripture instructed, lives of quiet. Though there are many affiliations of the Amish faith, nearly all follow the tenet of simplicity. That includes restrictions on the use of computers and other technologies. 鈥淲e don鈥檛 have access to Facebook or internet reports in a regular way,鈥 Miller says.

The Ohio alert system works similarly to other hotlines. Though Amish families generally don鈥檛 have personal phones (exceptions are made for business needs), the 12 counties that make up the Bobolink birding area have access to communal 鈥淏lack Box鈥 telephones, which allow multiple families to share a cellular line via a wired receiver. Spotters also phone in rarities by borrowing a cell phone belonging to a non-Amish taxi driver鈥攁 service they use, along with bicycles, to get to birding areas. Miller supplements his reports via a permitted computer connection (that is, he鈥檚 on eBird) at the lumberyard where he works. During migration season, Miller says, he鈥檚 received as many as 280 calls a day.

While the Amish have always had a strong connection to nature, birding didn鈥檛 really flourish in the Ohio Amish community until the 1990s, when a group of local birders started organizing Christmas Bird Counts and launched a birding journal called The Bobolink. Among them was Robert Hershberger, the owner of a local clock repair shop. It was his voice thanking Miller on my first call to the Bobolink line. Hershberger expanded his business to include binoculars and telescopes, and Amish birding took off.

鈥淗e helped lay the groundwork for a community that has become filled with lots of active, young birders, and which is still growing,鈥 says Bruce Glick, who writes a column about birds for the local Bargain Hunter newspaper. Glick, who is Mennonite, says that birding is a wholesome alternative to more worldly, and possibly wild, activities that occur during a freewheeling rite of passage called 鈥渞umspringa,鈥 in which Amish teens can sample outside life before choosing to be baptized in the faith. 鈥淪ome of these kids got in trouble before they joined the church. Birding is seen as a way to avoid those troubles, and it has really succeeded,鈥 Glick says. 鈥淎 lot of Amish kids learn to identify birds before they can walk.鈥

Calling Miller鈥檚 hotline doesn鈥檛 feel so much like a throwback as it does an encounter with something handcrafted. His delivery is folksy, slightly tinged with a Pennsylvania German accent, with relevant commentary thrown in. His report for June 23, 2021, noted Upland Sandpipers, Henslow鈥檚 Sparrows, and an extremely rare White-tailed Kite. Remarking on the appearance of a pair of Least Sandpipers, seen mating, Miller said, 鈥淚t鈥檚 hard to tell what those are up to. Do they actually nest in Ohio?鈥 He then told listeners how to find these birds and answer the question for themselves.

F

or decades the familiar voices of rare bird alert narrators have made thousands of birders feel included, even befriended. Marshall Iliff, eBird project leader at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, recalls dialing in to hear Claudia Wilds, then the voice of The Voice of the Naturalist, recite sightings near his childhood home in Maryland: 鈥淚鈥檇 call to hear her every Wednesday. It was something I looked forward to. I鈥檇 sit there with a red pencil and try to write down everything that she said, though sometimes I鈥檇 fall behind and have to call a second time.鈥 Those who remember Ruth Emery鈥檚 New England roundups share similar warm feelings. It鈥檚 something I felt when I first heard Eli Miller. What I was listening to wasn鈥檛 just a public service, it was an act full of meaning.

When I interviewed Petersen in April, he told me that he spent a couple of hours every week working on his recordings. But parts of the Massachusetts hotline were already operating in the past tense鈥攑ressing the keypad to branch into regional reports would yield sightings many months out of date. Mass 爆料公社 was, he said, debating whether to 鈥減ull the plug鈥 on the institution, now nearing its seventh decade of operation. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a jump ball at this point,鈥 said Petersen, who, like New York鈥檚 Burke, is in his 70s. By the time this story went to press, its fate might have tipped: New alerts were being distributed only in written form, and now seven months later, the recording I found so charming is still at the other end of the line, still lyrical, still lovely, like a fading family portrait.

__________

Seven months later, the recording I found so charming is still at the other end of the line, still lyrical, still lovely, like a fading family portrait.

__________

In my own family, my father lived for rarities. In February 1997 he heard Tom Burke announce that an Ivory Gull had been spotted off a pier in Portland, Maine鈥攁 sighting of such import that it made the New York Rare Bird Alert. He jumped into his cramped Honda Prelude and sped north. Upon arriving at the location, my father rolled down his window, raised his binoculars, and stared just long enough to get a confirmatory look鈥攁bout 15 minutes, he estimated. Then he drove home. His delight was palpable, because that sighting brought him one step closer to ticking off his North American species list. It wasn鈥檛 that my father didn鈥檛 love observing birds, but his true obsession was counting them (his life list, when he passed away, was well over 7,000 species). The Rare Bird Alerts were essential for that curated style of birding. 鈥淭hey probably contributed to more people seeing more life birds than anything until the internet,鈥 says DiCostanzo.

Today鈥檚 blockbuster birds are shared and logged on multiple platforms, accessible to anyone, anywhere. That flood of data has resulted in a shift in mindset. 鈥淲e鈥檝e moved to tracking all birds, all the time,鈥 Iliff says. Partially thanks to technology, and partially out of desperate ecological necessity, birding has become less a competitive game and more a form of community science. The electronic reports that today send droves of people to see a Painted Bunting in Brooklyn Bridge Park may indicate a migrant blown off course, but data from decades of Manx Shearwater observations in the Northeast reveal a range expansion that may offer insight into a changing climate.

The Rare Bird Alert sits at a sharp point of inflection鈥攅lite at its peak, but also a harbinger of the information-for-all age that is today bringing birding to new levels of popularity and scientific value. What both have in common is the thrill of the chase.

Recently I saw on eBird that a Harlequin Duck鈥攏ot a major rarity, but beautiful and less than totally frequent鈥攈ad been spotted at the Atlantic shoreline near York, Maine, about 45 minutes from where I live. I drove down and quickly spotted the bird. Unlike my father, I spent an hour or so with a half-dozen other birders. I later registered my sighting, becoming one of hundreds of observers in my state to do so this year. Although everything about the experience was modern, I felt the same excitement that I did looking at shearwaters with my father and Tom Davis decades ago. But I liked the scale at which the experience was shared. I liked knowing that I was doing something not just to see a bird, but also to help a bird, and to encourage others to peer through their binoculars.

And, of course, the Harlequin Duck, with its brilliant array of colors, is a joy to look at. It鈥檚 the kind of bird that makes you interested in birds. It鈥檚 the kind of find that feels immensely satisfying. That connection has always been at the heart of birding, no matter how the birds are announced, found, or observed. The phone lines may be silent, but the joy endures.

This story originally ran in the Winter 2021 issue as 鈥淭he End of the Dial-a-Bird Era.鈥濃 To receive our print magazine, become a member by .